Skip to content

There is no sea in heaven

May 12, 2010

Andrew Sullivan points to the finality of death as the inherent tragedy from which his religious view rescues him. But does it? Really? Has he examined his vision of an afterlife with the honesty that he asks about death? Heaven is one of the most ill-defined aspects of the salvational religions. The difficulty of imagining how a human being would spend an eternity, without lapsing into insanity, is compounded by the description of both heaven and its inhabitants as washed of much that makes us who we are, and that motivates our every act. In the Christian heaven, people will no longer desire to do anything that that religion describes as sinful. Imagine: never a lustful glance, never a desire for a second, too much piece of pie, never a prideful thought. Material need would be eliminated, and so also all that it motivates. There will be no games in heaven, because games presume a competitive spirit and all that entails. Which means also no mathematics or science. What would be the point? There is never sadness and regret, which means all past, earthly events whose remembrance generates these no longer have any meaning for those who hold those memories. There can be no fishing or hunting, since there is no death. Nature, if present, must be all rainbows and butterflies without gales or mosquitos. It is no wonder that Jesus cleanses heaven of the sea, that embodies so much that is impure, roiling and fickle, that is full of diverse animals from the minute to the huge, cold-blooded and warm, eating each other, that is an expanse without clear boundaries, smelling of life and decomposition, both at once, that has been exploited for trade, food, and conquest. The question for Andrew is whether he can turn the vapid descriptions of heaven — not this, not that, not the other, forever and ever, amen — into something that is positive, concrete, sensible, and meaningful. The fundamentalist Muslims at least offer 72 virgins. One suspects the excitement would wear off after ten thousand years. But it’s more than uninterrupted singing of praise! If we would have a fantasy to save us from facing death, it needs to be a good one. Even without a believing bone in my body, I can grow wistful over a good fantasy woven around a real tragedy. But heaven, as described by the Christians or Muslims, as an answer to death? That’s like saying life would be hard to face without belief in the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles to repair its injustices.

2 Comments leave one →
  1. John Burton permalink
    May 16, 2010 7:39 pm

    Russell — Is this humor? Goodness. If so, sorry I missed the joke. Go back and read “Captain Stormfield’s Visit to Heaven” (Mark Twain) for some real belly laughs about the secular view of the eternal reward.

    If not, this logic is beneath you.

    Go back and look at this from the standpoint that we as humans, locked into a universe bound by space and time, have no concept of what an omniscient and omnipotent God has planned for us in the after life. Biblical writers did their best to describe what they could within the framework of their knowledge, but at best the prophesies are unclear and subject to numerous interpretations. Experts in ancient Greek and Hebrew say that most are written in a style equivalent to our “once upon a time” writings — intended to be a way of conveying underlying truths without necessarily being exact and factual representations of the afterlife.

    Additionally, while some Christians do emphasize the greatness of the afterlife, most of those that I know see Christianity as a here-and-now commission to protect the weak, heal the sick, comfort those in grief, improve our culture and society, and raise children who will continue this improvement of the world we live in now.

    JB

  2. rturpin permalink*
    May 17, 2010 1:21 pm

    John, I have some respect for believers who would focus their religion on the here-and-now rather than on some promises of heaven. My post was responding to a comment by Sullivan, who wants atheists to hold a sense of tragedy, for not having a notion of the after life to put forward. What is it that believers have to contrast with that? There, you make my point for me. You claim to have “no concept of what an omniscient and omnipotent God has planned for us in the after life.” No concept. I don’t see what a great difference that should make, or why one would feel any wistfulness for not possessing a belief in something of which they have no concept.

Leave a comment