Skip to content

Freedom for me, but not for thee

January 3, 2016

There are many in the Christian religious right in this nation who complain when they think their religious freedom is infringed, even while they dismiss similar issues from those of other religions, and sometimes erect every impediment they can against Muslims practicing their religion. It’s completely unsurprising that this bias shows up in surveys.

The Constitution requires that all religions are treated the same under the law. Every time you are offended that your religion seems mistreated in law, you should ask yourself how you would evaluate the situation if the shoe were on the other foot. What if a county clerk denied you a marriage license because your fiance were ex-Muslim, and the clerk belongs to a Muslim sect that believes apostates cannot marry? Would you hold up that clerk’s religious freedom to abstain from her secular job? If not, then don’t support a Christian clerk’s refusal to issue marriage licenses to gays. You’re not interested in religious freedom, just in special privilege for your religious beliefs.

One can argue where the lines should be drawn. But they must be drawn the same for all religions. Not just all Christian sects. Not just traditional religions. All religions. One advantage the ACLU has in its defense of religious liberty is that it takes that principle seriously, working for the same rules for Christians, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Scientologists, Pastafarians, and Sikhs. Many on the religious right, of course, think the ACLU is biased against Christians, because of that. They are so accustomed to special treatment that equality is a large step down.

4 Comments leave one →
  1. January 3, 2016 11:49 am

    Did you get my prior comment? This is a test.

    • rturpin permalink*
      January 3, 2016 11:51 am

      The one on open carry? Yes, it is there. It’s going to be interesting to see how that plays out.

  2. January 3, 2016 11:53 am

    Bummer, I’m trying again… from memory!

    I think you nailed it in your last sentence. It is perceived that Christianity is “loosing ground” because it is losing its position of privilege, which is what our constitution requires. Additionally, unconstitutional traditions such as prayer in schools have been corrected and other religions and non-religions are gaining their constitutionally guarantees to equal treatment. All of this is perceived as a loss. Seems most humans that lose privileges, even in the name of equity, will only accept it kicking and screaming.

    • rturpin permalink*
      January 3, 2016 2:48 pm

      So let’s be careful. Students praying in school is protected by the Constitution. What was rightly removed was prayer led by a teacher or school official. I guarantee the Christians who complain about that would see things quite differently if their public school led students in daily Muslim prayers!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: